 |
|
|
|
|
|
From:  xyu |
Date:
April 8th, 2010 12:16 am (UTC)
|
| (Link) |
|
сегодня актуально: как кремлю удалось в киргизии
|
статью хорошо писать не постфактум а наперед когда читатели еще ничего не подозревают о том что произойдет: представляете как ТАКАЯ статья подействует edited: ------------------------------------- как кремлю удалось в киргизии: ------------------------------------- What To Expect in 2010, by J. R. Nyquist Published:January.04.2010 !!!!!!!!!!!! Peace, indeed, is a difficult matter. If America had a temple to Janus, its "twin gates of war" would be flung open at this very hour, exposing (in the words of Virgil) "the dread presence of heartless Mars." As strange as it sounds, the United States is fighting a war in Afghanistan, though Afghanistan is on the other side of the world, a landlocked country. Stranger still, American troops must trace their line of supply through territory controlled by enemies or potential enemies. This situation is unprecedented. Only an American general of the present generation would think it acceptable to deploy so many troops into a battle where they could be so easily cut off. There are four ways into Afghanistan: (1) through Russian-dominated South-Central Asia, (2) through China, (3) through Pakistan, (4) or through Iran. To secure a route through Central Asia, the United States government has named Russia as an ally, even though Russia actively supports anti-American forces in Latin America and Africa (especially, in Venezuela and Cuba). The route through China is not practicable, and China is no more an ally of the United States than Russia. Iran is openly hostile to America which the Iranian clerics have denounced as the "Great Satan." Tracing the U.S. supply line through Pakistan may be ill-conceived as well, since Pakistan is allied with China and sympathetic to the Taliban (which was supported by Pakistan in the past). An August 13 Pew research poll shows that 64 percent of Pakistanis regard the United States as an enemy. http://www.financialsense.com/stormwatch/geo/pastanalysis/2010/0104.htmlEdited at 2010-04-08 08:03 pm (UTC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| From: xyu |
Date:
April 5th, 2010 05:19 pm (UTC)
|
| (Link) |
|
тут целый пласт провокаций и манипуляций
|
The Bombings in Moscow by J. R. Nyquist ..... It is well known that the FSB come forward with an unbelievable public explanation, in essence, that the Ryazan bomb was a sack of sugar, and that the whole thing was an "exercise." Residents of the apartment were bought off, the police evidence was confiscated, and the local newspaper offices were burglarized. Weeks earlier, an "Islamic invasion" had been launched from Chechnya into Dagestan, which the Mufti of the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria, Akhmad Kadyrov, described as an affair organized by the Russian Interior Ministry. Akhmad Kadyrov had been a loyal Chechen patriot, that is, until he realized that the Russian security services had pumped Chechnya full of Arab Mujahidin. Akhmad Kadyrov warned his countrymen that the entire Chechen Revolution had nothing to do with Chechen independence. It was a vast military exercise by the Russian General Staff in which the Chechens were puppets.
From the Russian standpoint the Chechen operation was:
1)part alibi,
2)part Maskirovka,
3)and part diversion.In the 7 January 2000 edition of the London Arab language paper Al-Sharq al-Awsat, Akhmad Kadyrov obliquely suggested that Russian generals controlled the conflict from both ends. "This is not jihad," he explained, "it is rather deception." Akhmad Kadyrov said he had personally confronted Prime Minister Vladimir Putin on this issue. "I told Putin that if Russia really wanted to, not a single foreigner [i.e., al Qaeda terrorist] could have infiltrated into Chechnya or extended a single dollar to it, which means that this whole thing was deliberately planned." Putin was so impressed by Kadyrov's penetrating analysis, he made Kadyrov president of Chechnya. ... Those who feel for the victims, and who understand the role played by the FSB, also find it painful to read U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's "political condolences" in which she declares solidarity with Russia against "the common threat" of Islamic terrorism. "Being of ex-Soviet origin," says Banchik, "I disagree with such a stand. ... Anna Politkovskya found an FSB agent who worked ... to mastermind the incident. Immediately after that, the agent, Terkibaev, suddenly died on the street in Grozny in a 'car accident.'" ...... Russia is also the mother of so-called "Islamic terrorism." And because of this authorship, which was denied for years by a foolish CIA, the KGB successor organization finds a necessary alibi in the North Caucasus. Let Arab jihadists come flooding in. Let violence reign. We can always stomp it out later. The key thing is to fool the West. Divert the West. Because "Islamic terrorism" is the designated mask in a future Russian terror campaign against America. Terrorism in Russia cannot be taken at face value. Describing the tragic slaughter of children at Beslan in September 2004, Banchik wrote: "We gathered a bunch of evidence suggesting that the Beslan tragedy was masterminded and handled by Putin and the FSB.... One of the most pominent Chechen human rights activists, Said Emin Ibragimov, who lives in Strasbourg, told me one story that wasn't published. One of the Ossetian hostages who was lucky enough to emigrate from Russia told him that a Chechen women who 'guarded' her during the standoff said to her that she was brought there by Russian agents from a prison where she was put a year earlier. She asked her victim to forgive her because she felt that she wouldn't survive. She told her that she was cynically deceived by a prison guard who 'promised' her release if she agreed to 'stage' a bloodless siege to force Russian authorities to peace talks."...... http://www.hro.org/node/7163http://www.financialsense.com/stormwatch/geo/pastanalysis/2010/0402.htmlEdited at 2010-04-05 05:28 pm (UTC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
